Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Infor to acquire SSA in $1.4bn deal (FT)
It announced a $1.4bn deal to be acquired by Infor Global Solutions.
Infor, which is controlled by Golden Gate Capital and Summit Partners, the private equity groups, said it would pay $19.50 a share in cash for SSA, a premium of 25 per cent above Friday’s closing price for SSA shares.
SSA’s shares jumped more than 22 per cent to $19.04 by midday trading in New York.
The deal will add to Golden Gate’s growing stable of enterprise software companies. In November, Golden Gate announced a $1bn deal to acquire Geac, a Canadian software group specialising in financial and supply chain management systems.
Enterprise software has emerged as a favourite target for private equity groups working in the technology sector.
“We are seeing increased consolidation in the marketplace,” said Judy Sweeney, an analyst at enterprise software research group AMR Research. “[Private equity groups] are looking for financial gains by assembling these companies for economies of scale.”
Silver Lake Partners, another Silicon Valley buyout group, last year said it would buy Serena, an infrastructure software provider, for $1.2bn.
Last March, Silver Lake and six other private equity groups announced a deal to buy SunGard, a financial services software group, for $11.3bn in one of the biggest private equity deals of all time.
Enterprise software is viewed as a mature business, with little growth in new customer accounts.
However, many enterprise software companies see steady or even growing inflows of cash from providing maintenance and other services to existing clients.
Because Wall Street tends to value enterprise software groups based on new deal flow, many private equity groups consider the sector to be chronically undervalued, and some have been taking advantage of what they see as an opportunity to capture lucrative cash flow.
Jim Schaper, Infor’s chairman and chief executive, said the combined companies would have $1.6bn in annual revenues.
SSA and Infor said they expected the deal to close in the third quarter. SSA Global was advised by Schulte Roth and Zabel LLP and JPMorgan Securities. Infor was advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
Infor Acquires SSA Global (Line56)
SAP stresses master-data management (InfoWorld)
SAP on Tuesday emphasized the importance of users continually maintaining master data, a single version of attributes that best describe products or customers, as corporations work to rearchitect their IT systems.
SSA taken over by ERP arch-rival (CMC - InsightExec)
SSA Global Technologies, which last year gobbled up CRM firm Epiphany, is itself being acquired for about $1.3 billion by Infor to create the world's third-largest corporate software developer.Infor Chairman and CEO Jim Schaper said: "With this acquisition, Infor will become the third-largest enterprise software provider in the industry with approximately $1.6 billion in revenue."
Thursday, May 11, 2006
CRM Professional Services (Forrester)
CRM Services (Forrester)
Ariba LIVE 2006--It's time for spend management (AMR)
DDSN Versus SCM: Look to the Sky for the Differences, Part 2 (AMR)
In the first part of this series, “DDSN Versus SCM: Look to the Sky for the Differences, Part 1,” I looked at what we can learn about the implementation of demand-driven supply networks (DDSNs) by comparing them to our frequent experiences with airline travel. After a lot of positive feedback, I decided to do a sequel.
The Enterprise Application Market Is Destroying Its Fragile Ecosystem (AMR)
Radical consolidation, several years of recession, and a major change in corporate buying preferences have combined to stunt the growth of most of the hundreds of smaller software firms that once drove much of the industry’s vibrancy and innovation. These companies, which have traditionally distinguished themselves on the basis of vertical, functional, or geographic specialization, simply don’t seem to be participating in the economic recovery.
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
Microsoft to Enhance IT Asset Inventory With AssetMetrix Buy (Gartner)
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
It's a Duet: SAP/Microsoft Formalize Mendocino Project Offering (Gartner)
Lawson Finally Closes Acquisition of Intentia (AMR Research)
JDA Buying Manugistics (AMR Research)
Friday, April 28, 2006
Securing the Global Supply Chain (AMR)
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Kinaxis Goes On Demand (Line56)
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
JDA Acquires Manugistics (Line56)
Monday, April 24, 2006
The People Side of ERP (Line56)
Thursday, April 20, 2006
Strong growth in the US boosts SAP (FT)
SAP Starts 2006 With a Strong First Quarter (AMR Research)
SAP Update; salesforce.com To Go; Rapt, Pricing, and PLM (AMR)
SAP: Full Speed Ahead (Line56)
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
mySAP ERP & Enterprise Services Architecture: Delivering Operational Excellence
- Greater efficiency
- Reduce IT complexity
- Lower TCO
- Increase agility to change
ERP Market Tops $16.6 Billion and Still Growing Strong (ARC Advisory Group)
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Invensys Launches 'Sensor-to-Boardroom' Asset Controls (Gartner)
The Formula for Product Success: Focus on Flexibility and Cooperation (TEC)
One pillar of the success of Jeeves Information Systems AB (JIS) is the way it has developed its main product from scratch. While most competitors work painstakingly to rewrite or merge their many (often recently acquired) complex and rigid systems, Jeeves has always had a product with built-in open and flexible architecture. Recent studies by an independent market research company, DPU Research, show that Jeeves Enterprise repeatedly receives the highest rating among European users in terms of ease of use, value for money, functional breadth and depth, and so on. Jeeves Enterprise tries to emulate the user thought process, and to accommodate multiple ways of building systems, according to needs. It is modular, flexible, and customizable, with an integrated, broad-scoped, functional footprint catering to many business processes and industries.
Oracle fires a shot across Red Hat’s bows (FT)
Mr Ellison made the comments in an interview with the Financial Times this week, laying out strong reasons why the database software company should embed a version of Linux into its existing software.
Such a move would make life far harder for Red Hat, which has emerged as the leading Linux company so far – particularly if, as Mr Ellison suggested, IBM decided to follow suit.
As a shot across Red Hat’s bows, the comments have had an immediate impact. The Linux company’s shares have dropped 8 per cent this week – although at $5bn, the company is still worth around three times what it was a year ago. “We want them to be successful, because Red Hat is to some degree our way of competing with Microsoft down at the core level,” the Oracle chief executive officer said. “But they’re a small company and they’re not supporting the customers very well.”
One answer, he suggested, was to launch a new version of Linux, or simply embed the Red Hat version in Oracle’s products and offer support from its own service organisation.
Simply offering the Red Hat version of Linux to its own customers could create a legal dispute, according to Rick Sherlund, software analyst at Goldman Sachs.
But Oracle would still be free to create its own version from the free component programs available over the internet.
For now, Mr Ellison has advanced two reasons for not buying Red Hat or Novell, which became the second biggest distributor of Linux after its acquisition of the German company SuSe two years ago. One is price. Open source companies have started to attract fancy valuations, as evidenced by Red Hat’s purchase last week of JBoss – a company that Oracle had itself tried to buy. Without control of their own intellectual property, these companies are not as valuable as Wall Street thinks, according to Mr Ellison.
“If an open source product gets good enough, we’ll simply take it,” he said. “We can do that, IBM can do that, HP can do that – anyone with a large support organisation is free to take that intellectual property and embed it in their own products.
“I believe JBoss is a $16m company breaking even, MySQL is a $30m company breaking even,” said Mr Ellison.
“You can build a sustainable business [in open source], you just can’t charge a lot for it. There’s brand value – there’s real brand – there’s people, and that’s it.”
The second reason for not buying a Linux company, according to Mr Ellison, is the risk that other big technology companies would abandon it.
“I don’t see how we could possibly buy Red Hat – IBM would just say, ‘Larry, congratulations, we’re going our own way’,” he said.
Despite that, Red Hat’s growing dominance of the Linux business, and its decision to acquire JBoss and start building out a fuller “stack” of software that competes with companies like Oracle and IBM, could alter the balance of partnerships in the software world and prompt a more drastic response.
Transcript: FT interview with Larry Ellison (FT)
Richard Waters of the Financial Times interviewed Larry Ellison, the chief executive officer of Oracle. The following are excerpts from the interview:
FT: In an interview with the FT four years ago, you predicted an end to the period of disruptive innovation from small technology companies and said that, in a maturing industry, there would be slower growth and a consolidation of power in the hands of the market leaders. However, the software world seems to be awash with disruptive innovation again, in the form of open source software, software-as-a-service, and the Web 2.0 movement. What has changed?
LE: I still think that to tackle the big jobs, the consolidation will continue. Take software-as-a-service. [The stand-alone software-as-a-service ventures] are tiny companies. I do believe in it, Oracle has offered software-as-a-service for some time. I own 5 per cent of Salesforce.com, I was a founding investor. It’s a delivery mechanism for software. I believe, over time, more and more software will be delivered as a service – I totally believe that. I would argue I started the first big software-as-a-service company, [Netsuite]. I think you’ll see SAP and Oracle simply adapting to that.
FT: Mark Benioff of Salesforce.com would say, though, that the multi-tenanted architecture of a true software-as-a-service company is a very different business to the kind of hosted software Oracle sells.
LE: It wasn’t his idea. And it’s sheer nonsense: most companies don’t want multi-tenant. It’s a convenience for a supplier. Most companies don’t want their data co-mingled with other customers. Small companies will tolerate it.
We make more money selling software-as-a-service than we make just selling software. I’d much rather be in the monthly service charge business, I’ve said this repeatedly. [At present] a huge percentage of our sales are done in the last week of the quarter: all of that goes away, it’s a much better business model.
FT: But would Wall Street appreciate it? The stock market doesn’t seem to value Oracle’s recurring maintenance revenues as highly as your new licence sales.
LE: I guess they don’t think recurring revenue at 90 per cent margins is very valuable. But then, Wall Street thought that Ariba was worth more than Daimler Benz [during the dotcom bubble.] All I can say is, our profit margins are now north of 40 per cent and will continue to grow past 50 [per cent] because more and more of our business will be in this recurring form, the form of subscription renewals rather than software sales.
FT: But won’t your profit margins fall?
LE: We make more margin dollars. In the end, the only thing that really matters is how many billions we make this year. I’d much rather make $10bn at 40 per cent margins than $8bn at 50 per cent margins. I want to make $10bn. Our margin dollars will increase at a higher rate with software-as-a-service. Plus there’s no piracy, and no need to maintain old versions. There are huge advantages to the model.
FT: Will there be a difficult transition from new licence sales to regular recurring subscriptions?
LE: If all people measure is our licence sales, they’re going to be really disappointed in our open source acquisitions, because I can tell them exactly what the open source new licence sales will be next year - it will be zero. On the one hand, people say open source and software-as-a-service are really hot – on the other hand, all they look at is our new licence sales. It’s the kind of absurdity that you find in the world at times.
All I care about is that we keep growing our profits every year. We have a five-year plan to grow our profits at 20 per cent a year. Last year we overshot, we grew at 28 per cent. This year we will grow at 20. We’re growing our profits very, very rapidly.
FT: Is open source going to be disruptive to Oracle?
LE: No. If an open source product gets good enough, we’ll simply take it. Take [the web server software] Apache: once Apache got better than our own web server, we threw it away and took Apache. So the great thing about open source is nobody owns it – a company like Oracle is free to take it for nothing, include it in our products and charge for support, and that’s what we’ll do. So it is not disruptive at all – you have to find places to add value. Once open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. Keep in mind it’s not that good in most places yet. We’re a big supporter of Linux. At some point we may embed Linux in all of our products and provide support.
Just like software-as-a-service, we have to be good at it. We don’t have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source. At some point we could very well choose to have Linux as part of the Oracle database server. We certify it, we test it. We could have JBoss as part of our middleware. It costs us nothing. We can do that, IBM can do that, HP can do that – anyone with a large support organisation is free to take that intellectual property and embed it in their own products.
I’ve had this discussion with the CEOs of open source companies. We’ve looked at buying some, some with very high price tags – but since we already have access to all the intellectual property, why wouldn’t we just embed this technology in our technology and provide support.
FT: Yet you have bought an open source database company – what did you buy it for?
LE: The people. If the price is reasonable, and you’re getting a high quality development team – we love the Berkeley DB guys. It’s a great team.
The way open source companies are valued now is interesting. Wall Street looks back at the historic growth rate and extrapolates it out forever, that’s the way it works. It’s kind of funny.
What if IBM were to decide to support Red Hat Linux – what does that do to Red Hat? One of the big problems we have with Red Hat today is, they’re not very good at supporting the customers, so we help them a lot – we want them to be successful, because Red Hat is to some degree our way of competing with Microsoft down at the core level. But they’re a small company and they’re not supporting the customers very well.
FT: What are the arguments against Oracle distributing its own Linux version?
LE: They’re not very strong – now that Red Hat has bought JBoss and competes with us in middleware, we have to relook at the relationship – so does IBM. If Oracle were to have its own Linux distribution, or just provide paid support for Red Hat, that’s one thing – if Oracle and IBM both did it, it’s a whole new world. I don’t think Oracle and IBM want to create a second Microsoft in Red Hat. But you can’t – because Red Hat doesn’t own anything, they own nothing. They couldn’t [become the next Microsoft], they own nothing.
FT: How well has Novell done in becoming a viable competitor to Red Hat? [Encouraged by large technology companies like Oracle and IBM, Novell bought German Linux company SuSe two years ago.]
LE: I would say, not very well. Several of our big customers have switched to Novell because they get better service from Novell. But still, Red Hat competing with a Novell is one thing – Red Hat competing with IBM or Oracle is quite different.
FT: Why didn’t you buy JBoss?
LE: JBoss wanted to sell the company to us. Clearly if we wanted to buy JBoss we’d have bought JBoss. Why didn’t we buy JBoss? Because we don’t have to – if it ever got good enough we’d just take the intellectual property – just like Apache – embed it in our fusion middleware suite, and we’re done. We always have that option available to us – IBM always has that option available to them.
The reason I have a hard time writing checks for billions or hundreds of millions of dollars for things that are open source is that if we could do this, other people could do this too. I don’t see how we could possibly buy Red Hat – IBM would just say, Larry, congratulations, we’re going our own way. They could hire Red Hat people and they’d be in business straight away. So I don’t see how anyone can buy Red Hat, not at anything near these prices, because anyone who feels like taking the code – they have no intellectual property.
We see in China and India, all that stuff is freely available and Red Hat is just cut completely out of the market. I’m not gong to spend $5bn, or $6bn, for something that can just be so completely wiped off the map. They take all the Red Hat code, have their own equivalent of the Red Hat network, and Red Hat gets zero.
So its all very interesting. You can build a sustainable business [in open source], you just can’t charge a lot for it. There’s brand value – there’s real brand – there’s people, and that’s it.
Sunday, April 16, 2006
Jeeves—Thriving Organically as a Humble Servant (TEC)
Prophet of Oracle’s evolving future (FT)
This is Larry Ellison's personal Xanadu. Designed, he says, to resemble a Japanese village with structures from different parts of the country's history, it has taken five years to plan and 10 to build.
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Enterprise Resource Planning for Services, and Professional Services Automation: Where Do You Draw the Line? (TEC)
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Market to Exceed $21 Billion (ARC Advisory Group)
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
SAP Fills Its Compliance Gap With Virsa Acquisition Deal (Gartner)
More ERP Consolidation: Intuitive Makes Two Acquisitions (AMR)
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
SAP Acquires Virsa (Line56)
Monday, April 03, 2006
SAP Snaps Up Virsa Systems To Enhance Compliance Story (AMR)
SAP Buys Compliance Firm (Red Herring)
Thursday, March 30, 2006
Clarifying Oracle's Fusion Strategy (AMR)
Free ERP (Line56)
Saturday, March 25, 2006
SAP Service Marketplace (SAP)
Monday, March 20, 2006
SAP MDM Value (Line56)
Thursday, March 16, 2006
Lawson's ERP upgrade adds SOA capabilities (InfoWorld)
More Industry Consolidation as SSA Global Acquires Provia (Gartner)
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Software for the Software Company (Line56)
SAP Safe Passage (Line56)
Agents in the Supply Chain: New Technology Offers Planning Promise (AMR)
As a mature technology, it is worth asking what alternatives are around, and if these present real opportunities for distinction in the market. While still in an early phase in terms of application development, agent technology offers one such alternative, with often faster, more reactive, more realistic planning, decision support, and simulation.
Monday, March 13, 2006
SSA Buys Provia (Line56)
SSA Global Technologies, the company best known for buying a string of enterprise applications vendors (including Baan as well as plenty of others), has now acquired warehouse management specialist Provia. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Sunday, March 12, 2006
SAP/R3, Oracle (PeopleSoft), MAPICS, move over. There's a new guy in town. (xperia)
Xperia Takes on Tier One ERP Vendors in the SMB Market (itjungle)
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Dassault Systemes to Expand PLM Scope With MatrixOne Purchase (Gartner)
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
Agassi wants Microsoft more visible than SAP (InfoWorld)
Monday, March 06, 2006
Microsoft To Shift ERP Pricing (CRN)
Friday, March 03, 2006
Dassault buys US rival MatrixOne
SAP employees in Germany vote against workers' council (InfoWorld)
Thursday, March 02, 2006
Dassault Acquires MatrixOne (Line56)
Buzzword: PLM
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Warehouse Intelligence (Line56)
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
SAP Denies Big M&A Plans (Line56)
Friday, February 24, 2006
IBM Positioned in Magic Quadrant for Product Information Management Software (Market Wire)
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Supply Chain Risk Management and the Avian Flu: Is Your Supply Chain Ready? (AMR)
i2 Buys RiverOne (AMR)
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Supply Chain Organization Success (Line56)
Ansys' Acquisition of Fluent Will Raise the Stakes in CAE (Gartner)
Buzzword: Product Life Cycle Management (PLM)
Monday, February 20, 2006
Mere SCM (Line56)
Enterprise Resource Planning Vendors Address Lean Manufacturing (TEC)
Saturday, February 18, 2006
Oracle outlines ambitious business software plans (USATODAY)
Fusion is a linchpin in Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's quest to unseat the top corporate applications company, Germany's SAP, in the $26.5 billion global market for software that companies use to run human resources, accounting and other business functions.
Friday, February 17, 2006
Sleepycat Acquisition Brings Oracle Open-Source DBMS (Gartner)
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Oracle Acquires Sleepycat (Line56)
Sunday, February 12, 2006
Saturday, February 11, 2006
Oracle to lay off 2,000 people (San Francisco Chronicle)
Friday, February 10, 2006
Warehouse Intelligence (Line56)
Monday, February 06, 2006
SAP Premium Support Offering Unlikely to Sway Users (Gartner)
Has SAP Nailed Plant Level Leadership with Lighthammer? (TEC)
Thursday, February 02, 2006
SAP ventures into on-demand software field (FT)
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
RedPrairie's Acquisition Binge: Snags Alta A/S and Marc Global Holdings (AMR Research)
Monday, January 30, 2006
Enterprise Resource Planning Giants Eye the Shop Floor (TEC)
Friday, January 27, 2006
Microsoft Business Solutions Turns Profitable (TechWeb)
Buzzword: Axapta
SAP vs. Oracle battle gets bloodier (CNN.com)
RedPrairie Will Gain Leading WMS Technology With MARC Global (Gartner)
Thursday, January 26, 2006
ERP-markt rooskleurig, vooral voor Microsoft (AG)
De ERP-markt ziet er voor de leveranciers rooskleurig uit, concludeert AMR Research uit onderzoek. Meer dan 70 procent van de bedrijven is van plan dit jaar zijn ERP-uitgaven te verhogen.
"Uit ons onderzoek blijkt dat er een flinke stijging in de ERP-uitgaven aankomt in 2006. Met bedrijven van allerlei grootte die hun ERP-budget verhogen, wordt het voor de topleveranciers op dit gebied een mooi jaar", aldus analist Jim Shepherd van AMR.
Gevraagd naar de leverancier van hun voorkeur gaf het grootste percentage respondenten overigens aan voor Microsoft Business Systems te kiezen. Oracle en SAP kwamen respectievelijk op de tweede en derde plaats. (Freek Blankena)
De ERP-markt ziet er voor de leveranciers rooskleurig uit, concludeert AMR Research uit onderzoek. Meer dan 70 procent van de bedrijven is van plan dit jaar zijn ERP-uitgaven te verhogen.
ERP's Inventory Benefits (Line56)
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
IBM and PTC Partner on PLM (AMR)
SAP Tops the $10B Mark, Eyes $70B Market (AMR)
SAP leads Europe higher (FT)
SAP expects to double revenues in four years (FT)
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Supply Chain Integration in China, Part II
Supply Chain Success Revisited (Line56)
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Supply Chain Integration in China, Part I (Line56)
Monday, January 16, 2006
Oracle Aquires 360Commerce: The Retail M&A Frenzy That Just Won’t Quit (AMR)
Thursday, January 12, 2006
How SAP Customers Can Manage Enterprise Architecture, Part 1: The Challenge (AMR)
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Oracle Acquires Temposoft (Line56)
SAP partners add more vertical applications for SMBs (InfoWorld)
ERP Today: No Safe Haven? (BCG)
in terms of how and what to select regarding ERP systems. That leadership role is currently
faltering.
SAP Boasts a Strong Q4 (Red Herring)
The software giant says strong software sales helped it beat analysts’ expectations.
SAP said Tuesday its fourth-quarter revenue will exceed its prior forecasts thanks in large part to an 18 percent rise in software sales over the year-earlier quarter.
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
View The Key Factors For SMB ERP Market Vendors to Be Successful and Analysis of the Standard For SMB Businesses to Choose ERP Vendors (Business Wire)
Silver Creek Systems Noted in Product Information Management Magic Quadrant
LOUISVILLE, Colo., Jan. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Silver Creek Systems, a
provider of enterprise data usability solutions, was noted in Gartner's Magic
Quadrant for Product Information Management 2005, published Dec. 30, 2005 by
Gartner Analyst, Andrew White.
Keyword: PIM
Friday, January 06, 2006
ERP Underused and Difficult (Line56)
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
A New Year’s Prediction and Wish (AMR)
As we look ahead to a new year, my prediction is winning businesses will be the heroes of the next decade. I’m not talking about celebrity CEOs—I’m talking about the quietly competent practitioners who will dominate the global supply chain to meet demand whenever and wherever it exists. They will be the heroes because, as global business further develops, it will be in the interest of these winning businesses to solve global problems.
In fact, it is their ability to address these problems as supply chain leaders that will distinguish these companies from their competitors. A stretch? Maybe. But it’s no coincidence that supply chain leaders like Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and Procter & Gamble (each featured on “The AMR Research Supply Chain Top 25 for 2005” performers list) were among the first to meet the needs of the victims of Hurricane Katrina.